Hot news

Dublinbet

Dublinbet

DublinBet.com is an innovative and classy casino and card room. It offers classic online casino game favourites plus some of the best live dealer games on the net for January 2012.

Through the latest webcasting technology you can interact with dealers from the privacy of your home (or office!). The sounds and dealer action is live from the Fitzwilliam Card Club and Casino, in Dublin Ireland. DublinBet's Distance Gaming® is a 'must try even if you're not fussed for live dealer games - try the unique early payout

+ More info...

888

888

Do you find it hard to get to a live casino to play poker? Then simply come to 888poker, the best poker online room in Australia and experience the same thing with no hassle.888 Casino is one of the most famous casinos in cyberspace, thanks to some of the most eye-catching promotions in the industry and an ongoing commitment to innovation. Owned and operated by a subsidiary of 888 Holdings plc, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange, 888 Casino was launched in 1997 and more than 25 million people have played here since.

+ More info...

365 Casino

365 Casino

Enjoy a huge selection of casino games at 365 Casino with monthly bonuses and weekly promotions, Play Blackjack, Roulette, Baccarat, Slots, and Video Poker and win big at 365 casino. 24hrs a day, 365 days a year Safe & secure with excellent Customer Service.

+ More info...

Elegance Casino

Smart Live Casino

The unique thing about Smart Live Casino is its live casino games. It offers live baccarat, live roulette and live blackjack where the player sees the dealer and the action unfold infront of his own eyes. They have a fully array of games as well as sports betting. The site also comes in a variety of languages.

+ More info...

Commission demands new vote by Revere residents on revised Suffolk Downs casino plan - Metro

E-mail Print PDF
Commission demands new vote by Revere residents on revised Suffolk Downs casino plan - Metro

The new Mohegan Sun casino proposal at Suffolk Downs will be allowed to compete for the Greater Boston casino license, after the state gambling commission offered Tuesday to waive its deadlines to permit a second referendum vote in Revere.

The commission’s much-
anticipated decision sets the stage for what is likely to be a bitterly fought two-month campaign during the dead of winter, followed by another citywide vote in Revere, probably around mid-February, on whether there will be casino gambling at Suffolk Downs.

The commission’s change applies only to the Dec. 31 deadline for the referendum and leaves intact a year-end deadline for Mohegan Sun to submit all plans and documents for its proposal. That will require the Connecticut casino giant, which announced a deal to build at Suffolk Downs on Nov. 27, with the burden of designing a casino proposal and traffic plan in just weeks.

Mitchell Etess, chief executive of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, said in a statement that the company looks forward to “working in cooperation with our host community of Revere on the path the commission outlined.”

Continue reading below

The commission’s recommendation for another vote was a surprise twist in a monthlong drama that began Nov. 5, the night Suffolk Downs’s casino plan was rejected by voters in East Boston but embraced in Revere. Original plans called for a casino to be built on the East Boston side of the city line that passes through the racetrack’s property. Within hours of the vote, casino proponents suggested they would bypass the East Boston results by moving the proposal over the city line into Revere.

Casino opponents in East Boston argued that Revere’s Nov. 5 vote could not apply to a new project; proponents insisted that the original vote was enough.

The offer to lift the deadline for the referendum, proposed by commissioner James McHugh, is a compromise and perhaps the only outcome both sides hate equally.

“They made a mockery of the democratic process here,” said Celeste Myers, a leader of the No Eastie Casino group, which wanted the commission to refuse the Mohegan Sun proposal.

Mayor Dan Rizzo of Revere, a casino supporter, had hoped the commission would simply accept last month’s vote as a valid endorsement of Mohegan Sun’s new plans, as a majority of the panel had signaled last week they were willing to do. On Tuesday he complained that his city now “becomes ground zero for every anticasino group on earth.”

Allowing the Mohegan Sun project to stay in the running, at least until the new referendum, maintains a sense of competition for the state’s most lucrative casino license.

Last month, Milford voters killed a Foxwoods casino plan in their town, leaving Wynn Resorts as the only other casino applicant standing in the Greater Boston region.

Wynn is planning a gambling resort in Everett, where 86 percent of voters endorsed the plan at a referendum in June. Wynn officials declined to comment Tuesday on the commission’s decision.

Mike McLaughlin, an Everett city councilor and a strong backer of the Wynn project, suggested that the move was unfair to the casino project in his city, which won its vote and is complying with the deadlines. “I don’t think any member of the gaming commission has given fair respect to the city of Everett and Wynn Resorts,” McLaughlin said in a statement.

Suffolk Downs’s original proposal called for two hotels, a casino, spa, and other amenities, run in concert with the thoroughbred racetrack.

Under the new proposal, planned entirely on the Revere side of the property, Suffolk Downs would be a landlord, not the casino owner. Plans call for Mohegan Sun to build and own the casino on land leased from Suffolk Downs, independent of the track. The new arrangement would no longer require Suffolk Downs to continue horse racing, through track officials have pledged to keep racing.

About 61 percent of Revere voters supported the original Suffolk Downs casino plan. While Rizzo said he worries about election fatigue among the voters, he added, “They will, I’m confident, come out once again to show our support and allow Mohegan Sun to go forward.”

Revere is also likely to receive much more money than under the original proposal, which guaranteed $9 million a year. Rizzo is negotiating a new host agreement with Mohegan Sun, which he hopes to have done within 7 to 10 days.

Myers, from the No Eastie Casino group, did not rule out legal action to block the proposal and pledged to continue the campaign on the ground.

“Bottom line, where No Eastie Casino stands, we have a lot of friends in Revere,” she said. “We’re going to take the same path we did in East Boston: provide as much information as possible in Revere, provide the support that they need, and be there for them.”

The anticasino group has called for Mayor-elect Martin J. Walsh of Boston to publicly oppose the casino plan, based on the vote of his East Boston constituents. Walsh did not take a position Tuesday, saying through a spokeswoman that there is still some question about whether Boston is a host community for the project, with the power to block the proposal, or a surrounding community, which can negotiate for compensation, but has no vote and little leverage.

“The deadline for the new proposal is Dec. 31, and until that proposal is put forth and we are able to examine the plans, there still remain questions about whether or not Boston should be considered a host community or a surrounding community,” said a statement from Walsh spokeswoman Kate Norton.

But Suffolk Downs and Mohegan officials have been emphatic in their view that Boston would be a surrounding community for the new proposal.

Revere resident Steven James, interviewed Tuesday, wondered why Revere had to endure yet another referendum campaign. “We already voted on it; what’s going to change?” he said. “We want the casino. I don’t understand why we need another vote.”

Rick Silva of Revere opposes casinos and will vote no. “I’ve seen what gambling really does to people,” he said. “It’s like a drug. It takes over people’s lives, and they spend money they don’t have.”

Read more http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNE4zxOFAEP6Zu1RR0HtvDTV9_V05w&url=http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/12/10/commission-demands-new-vote-revere-residents-revised-suffolk-downs-casino-plan/j5O01CB6WYC6OIdLp7TsyJ/story.html

You are here