Early this summer, New Yorkers can expect to see proposals for four new casinos upstate. Some communities in the Catskills and Western New York are ready to welcome these gambling meccas, especially if they come with good jobs, as promised.

But at least one historic town does not want a mini-Las Vegas nearby. That is Saratoga Springs, home of the famous racetrack, the thermal springs, the Saratoga Performing Arts Center that houses the New York City Ballet in the summer, Skidmore College and other attractions.

The problem is that Saratoga Springs residents can’t say no if the state decides to place a casino in their area. In Massachusetts, for instance, local residents can vote to reject a casino development in their community. New York State law offers no community veto. It will be up to a new gaming commission and its appointees to choose where and what the new casinos will be.

Having no real say in the matter is simply unfair to the communities that are often saddled with the downsides of these gambling operations. The police often have to cope with more traffic, more crime. Local businesses often see fewer customers, not more. These casino resorts draw busloads of people, but they are designed to keep visitors on the grounds with restaurants and shops. Most people have no need to venture into the surrounding area.

Even real estate prices can suffer. Agents are already hearing that some Saratoga Springs residents are looking for “an exit strategy” if a big casino comes to town.

Even though Saratoga Springs already has some gambling connected to its racetracks, many residents say that is enough. Though state voters approved a constitutional amendment allowing casinos in November, more than 57 percent of Saratoga Springs voters said no. And they should have the right to say no to a casino.